|
1997-2006 Academic Years Climate and Environment |
![]() |
15 September 1998: Karlene Kurth [Lane Tech HS]
She had an idea (source was an old Physics Teacher) to spice up the
first
experiment---instead of just measuring and avoiding a conclusion give a
problem.
Find the volume of a room and ask how long there will be enough
breathable air.
She showed a way of measuring the volume a person breathes. An inverted
graduated cylinder in a pot all filled with H2O and a straw
to
breathe through to get air in the cylinder. Also units and conversion
to a
common measure could be discussed. One of the ways variables was that
if several
people were exterminated the others would live longer--of course the
obvious
variables---level of activity, etc. [5 breaths took 18 seconds and was
about
1070 ml or about 1 liter. 2 -5 days was a typical conclusion .]
[editor's note: I have tried to emphasize significant places and accuracy as part of the conclusion. Using the correct device -Calipers for small distance, or using the floor tile as a gauge of distance, I have given something impossible to do with the equipment and see what they came up with--This is an interesting spin.]
Porter Johnson -comments-
Now with newer construction -plastic wrap, double glass windows, etc -
there is
much less air being changed in the homes. Where in an old home air was
replaced
in 15 min to 30 min, in newer houses it is much longer. This may cause
problems
when inside air is being used for combustion. Fireplaces and furnaces
now often
draw outside air and exhaust that air, avoiding serious problems with
the inside
air.
Radon gas [http://radon.com/radon/radon_facts.html and http://ace.orst.edu/info/extoxnet/faqs/indoorair/radon.htm] was also brought up as potentially very dangerous, even possibly worse than asbestos [http://wshiivx.med.uoeh-u.ac.jp/asbestos/pubheal.htm,]. Asbestos doesn't seem to be that deadly, and insurance settlements have been based upon highly questionable estimates of damages. [CNA asbestos settlement of $2 billion dollars was based upon a premium paid of less than $10,000.] The problems arising from asbestos removal can be much greater, because of airborne dust.
Radon as a chemical will not react but the problem is that it decays with a half-life of 3.4 days, and may cause serious respiratory damage in the lungs, since the Radon may stick to air sacs in the lung, and do serious damage there. The decay sequence for Uranium is the following:
Uranium ---> Thorium ---> Radium ---> Radon ---> Polonium ---> Lead
Radon is formed by this decay of Uranium [present in coal and various shale rocks], and it seeps upward and into basements. Concrete is a fairly porous substance (tar is often placed on the under side of concrete to seal concrete) and if the air pressure is negative (less that outside) Radon is sucked out of the ground. A furnace using air from inside for combustion causes a negative pressure, allowing radon to be sucked in. It was mentioned that one of the products to reduce Radon was a pump to remove air from the basement if the air pressure dropped. Radon levels vary with the geographic area--what is underground and how easily it can escape.
The high voltage in a TV set (27 kV) attracts dust and with a Geiger Counter will show signs of the activity.
12 October 1999: Discussion
26 October 1999: John Bozovsky (Bowen HS),
rushing the season perhaps, explained wind chill temperatures to us.
(handout;
see http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/windchill/index.shtml)
For example, 0oF is equivalent to -22oF in a 10
mph wind.
This is cause the wind lowers body temperature by evaporating
perspiration off
the surface of our skin and blowing body heat away. The effect
increases with
wind speed. A graph of wind chill temperature vs air temperature at any
given
wind speed are approximately straight lines that converge at the warm
end -
about 85o F or so. Using the data handout from John to make
such a
graph is a good exercise for students. And now we can figure the wind
chill on
Hallowe'en, with wind at, say, 20 mph! Thanks, John!
26 September 2000 Bill Colson (Morgan Park HS)
gave us handouts containing an explanation for why dry air is heavier
(more
dense) than moist air, from Tom Skilling's weather page
(website http://www.wgntv.com/weather/search.html)
in the Chicago Tribune (http://chicagotribune.com
. He wondered about any relevance of Avogadro's number to
this. Ideas? [Comment
by PJ: Avogadro's number tells you how many
molecules of an
ideal gas there are in one mole of the gas, corresponding to a
volume of 22.4
liters at STP. The higher the molecular weight of gas, the
heavier
one mole will be, and thus the denser the gas. Water vapor [molecular
weight 18]
thus replaces nitrogen [molecular weight 28] and oxygen [molecular
weight 32]
molecules, to produce less dense air. Thus, home runs in baseball
are more
likely on humid days!
20 January 2002 Bill Shanks (Joliet Central, Physics, Retired)
Meterological Winter
Meteorological winter is defined as the period December 1 - March
1, because
this is the coldest period of the year in the northern hemisphere. Why?
Precisely why is it colder in the winter than in the summer?
Graduating
seniors at Harvard a few years ago incorrectly suggested that the earth
is
closer to the sun in summer than in winter. A good physics
student might
refer to the "glancing incidence" of sunlight in winter, but does s/he
know what that means? The total solar flux is about 1400
watts per
square meter, as measured for normal incidence. The angle of
the sun
with the vertical in Chicago varies from q
=
42°+23° = 65° in winter to q
= 42°-23°
=19° in summer. As a consequence, the solar energy
delivered to the
ground is 1400 ´ cos q
Watts/m2, which varies from 1324 Watts/m2
[summer] to 591 Watts/m2 [winter]. Bill
illustrated the
role of the angle of incidence using his bright flashlight and white
paper. The
paper was definitely brighter when the light shone directly on
it. In a
similar vein, snow cover melts more quickly where it has a southern
exposure,
because of the heat absorbed from direct sunlight.
20 January 2002: Bill Shanks (Joliet Central, Physics, Retired)
Q: What is a Monolithic Concrete Dome?
A: (given by Ann S Bosley:
http://birmingham.bcentral.com/birmingham/stories/2000/07/31/focus3.html)
The Monolithic Concrete Dome is a super-insulated,
steel-reinforced concrete structure. David B. South, president of the
Monolithic Dome Institute, and his brothers, Barry and Randy South,
developed an efficient method for building a strong dome using a
continuous spray-in-place process.
In 1976, following years of planning and development, they built the
first Monolithic Dome in Shelley, Idaho.
Since then, Monolithic Domes have been constructed for homes, schools,
gymnasiums, churches, offices and
bulk storage facilities in 45 states and in many foreign countries.
Briefly, here are the steps involved in building such a dome:
06 May 2003
Earl Zwicker passed around an Environmental
Disclosure Statement distributed by Commonwealth Edison,
which indicated 65 % of their energy is obtained from nuclear
power, 30 % from coal-fired power, 2 % natural gas-fired
power, and 3 % is purchased from other companies. Because of
their reliance upon nuclear energy, their emissions are significantly
below the averages in the Midwest, which is 75 % coal-powered
and 22 % nuclear. Very interesting!
09 September 2003: Don Kanner [Lane Tech HS,
physics] Hygroscope
Don showed us the String Thing executive toy manufactured
by Can You
Imagine http://www.cyi.net/.
The
following entry is excerpted from that site:
"The Amazing String Thing creates magical string effect nearly 3 feet in the air! Point it up, down, even sideways and watch as the string playfully dances in mid-air, gently touching the string generates wave patterns and interactive shapes that seem to defy gravity. The String Thing can be used with its own display cradle or you can hold the lightweight unit in your hand! Blacklight Responsive string looks great under any light. Battery Operated."Don also presented Earl Zwicker with the device, which very nicely displays the "dimple effect" discussed in the Mathematics-Physics SMILE meeting of 05 February 2002. http://www.iit.edu/~smile/weekly/mp020502.html. Very visual, Don!
Don touted the venerable book A History of Physics by Florian Cajori [1899]. The book is readable, and contains a number of interesting quotes, insights, and examples that refer to original sources. For example, Count Rumford [American Loyalist who died as a Bavarian nobleman] is quoted as saying that he expected to live long enough to see Caloric entombed along with Phlogiston--but he did not live that long. In addition, he learned about the Hygroscope, a device used by Nicclaes de Cusa [1401-1446] to measure the moisture content of air. The idea is to balance a scale with rocks on one side, and dry wool on the other side. As time goes on, the wool will absorb water from the atmosphere, and become heavier than the rocks. Don used a digital scale with a micro-camera attached to a small television set to show the scale reading. He began by putting 11.78 grams of dry wool on the scale. Here is a record of the readings (taken by Porter Johnson) every five minutes
| Time | Mass (grams) |
change in mass |
Elapsed time (minutes) |
Calculated mass change |
| 4:45 | 11.78 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 4:50 | 12.11 | 0.33 | 5 | 0.19 |
| 4:55 | 12.24 | 0.46 | 10 | 0.35 |
| 5:00 | 12.34 | 0.56 | 15 | 0.47 |
| 5:05 | 12.41 | 0.63 | 20 | 0.57 |
| 5:10 | 12.46 | 0.68 | 25 | 0.66 |
| 5:15 | 12.51 | 0.73 | 30 | 0.73 |
| 5:20 | 12.57 | 0.79 | 35 | 0.78 |
| 5:15 | 12.60 | 0.82 | 40 | 0.81 |
| 5:30 | 12.63 | 0.85 | 45 | 0.85 |
| 5:35 | 12.66 | 0.88 | 50 | 0.88 |
| 5:40 | 12.68 | 0.90 | 55 | 0.90 |
| 5:45 | 12.70 | 0.92 | 60 | 0.92 |
| 5:50 | 12.72 | 0.94 | 65 | 0.93 |
| 5:55 | 12.73 | 0.95 | 70 | 0.94 |
| 6:00 | 12.74 | 0.96 | 75 | 0.95 |
| 6:05 | 12.75 | 0.97 | 80 | 0.96 |
The dry wool was prepared by heating ordinary wool in an oven at 95 - 100 °C for 30 minutes, and then enclosing it in a sealed container. After it is placed on the scale in the open air, the mass of the wool continually increases with time. That rate of increase decreases with time, and it appears to level off after a little over an hour.
Note by Porter Johnson: Let us make the simplifying assumption that the increase of mass of the wool gradually levels off according to the formula
Don, you certainly pulled the wool over our eyes! Good work, and keep reading those ancient tomes!
07 October 2003: Roy Coleman passed out information on weather and rain, that came from articles by Tom Skilling, which appeared in recent issues of the Chicago Tribune. They contained the following information:
| Cloud Type | Water vapor density | Vertical height | Horizontal spread | Mass |
| Cirrus | 0.1 g/m3 | 1 km | 25 km ´ 25 km | 8 ´108 kg |
| Cumulus | 0.2 g/m3 | 1 km | 1 km ´ 1 km | 2 ´105 kg |
| Cumulus Congestus | 0.8 g/m3 | 5 km | 2 km ´ 2 km | 2 ´10 8 kg |
| Cumulonimbus | 1.0 g/m3 | 10 km | 6 km ´ 6 km | 4 ´109 kg |
Roy Coleman [Morgan Park HS, Physics]
Estimating the Speed of Falling Rain
Drops
First, go out and buy a car in which the rear window slopes at a modest
angle
(say, q » 30°) to the
horizontal. Then, drive your car during a rainstorm, and
find the minimum speed v0 at which falling raindrops
do not
strike that rear window. If there is no wind, the speed of the
falling
raindrops vf should satisfy the relation vf
/
v0 = tan q. Simple,
non?
If the wind is blowing, repeat the observation while going in the
opposite
direction as well, and take the average. Be sure not to crash
into
anything while doing this experiment!
Now, there's a good reason to get rid of the old clunker and get a new
car. Nice work, Roy!
21 October 2003: Jane Shields [Calumet HS,
science]
Weather Frog
Jane made a "blow by blow" description of her attempts to
construct a Weather Frog, which hops up a ladder during periods
of high
atmospheric pressure and down the ladder at low atmospheric
pressure. The
idea is to place a flexible plastic seal over the top of a quart
[liter] glass
jar, with a string wrapped around a (sewing needle) shaft a few
times. One end of the
string is attached to the underside of the plastic seal, and a small
weight is suspended from
the other end. The shaft is free to rotate. One end of a
rigid metal wire is
attached perpendicularly to
the shaft, and the paper frog is hooked to its other end. As air
pressure
changes, the seal moves slightly up or down, so the shaft rotates, and
the frog moves up
or down. Jane's
apparatus almost worked, and she was determined to succeed with
it.
Very good, Jane!
A nice description of the principles behind the operation of the Weather Frog, as well as details for its construction, are contained on the Nebraska Earth Systems Education website: Too Heavy For Me; An Elementary Unit about Air Pressure: http://nesen.unl.edu/Lessons/Atmosphere/tooheavyforme.asp, from which the following has been excerpted:
HOW A BAROMETER WORKS: "A barometer has a piece of special metal in it called corrugated metal that squeezes down when heavier air pushes on it and expands up when lighter air does not push so much on it. There is a needle attached to the metal that points to a number on the dial to tell the air pressure. There are also words on the barometer to tell what the weather conditions will do according to the air pressure: rain, change, and fair. Lower numbers indicate low pressure and higher numbers indicate high pressure. Air pressures usually range from 29.00 to 31.00 inches [of mercury] in Nebraska."Jane also passed around an RD Challenge --- illusions that appeared in the September 2003 issue of The Readers Digest [http://www.rd.com]. Other illusions, which appeared in the January 2002 issue, can be seen at the website http://www.rd.com/common/nav/index.jhtml?articleId=9524839&channelId=6. This website also contains links to the Counter-rotating Spirals Illusion [http://dogfeathers.com/java/spirals.html], Grand Illusions [http://www.grand-illusions.com/opticalillusions/], and Artful Illusions [http://members.aol.com/Ryanbut/illusion1.html]. Neato!
24 February 2004: Porter Johnson passed out a table obtained from the website Beaufort Scale of Wind Force and Its Probable Wave Height: http://www.r-p-r.co.uk/beaufort.htm. The Beaufort Scale is the international standard for describing wind velocity ( as measured 11 meters above the surface -- called "Wind Force" by Marine Meteorologists) and relating it to steady-state probable and maximum (crest to trough) wave heights on deep, open water. For example, Wind Force 4 (Moderate breeze) corresponds to winds around 7 meters/second and average wave heights of about 1 meter, whereas Wind Force 8 (Gale) corresponds to 20 m/sec winds and 6 meter waves, and Wind Force 12 (Hurricane threshold) corresponds to 35 m/sec winds and 14 meter waves. For more details check the website, as well as other sites linked to it.
15 November 2005: Ann Brandon (Joliet West HS,
retired)
Strange Temperatures on Shipboard
Ann recently made a voyage through the Panama Canal, on
which there
were daily weather reports. She was struck by some of the
temperatures: 57 °C = 14 °F and 69 °C = 20 °F.
Very strange temperatures --- even for the tropics! Thanks,
Ann.