In the information age we live in, the prevalence of complex information systems in our society has been spreading at breakneck speeds. With almost every aspect of our daily lives depending on digital data transmission and verification, it is immediately evident that the need to protect these channels is paramount. Due to the fact that most attention seems to be on outsider threats to information (evident by the multitude of hacker-themed books and films available), many people may be surprised that outsider threats make up the minority of computer crime. The real danger lies in what the Defense Personnel Security Research Center has called “a Peopleware Problem”.
According to the Ponemon Institutes’ 2006 National Survey on Managing the Insider Threat, of the 450 IT professionals surveyed, “more than 78% of respondents reported one or more unreported insider-related security breaches within their company.” [1]
With shocking statistics like that, it's even more surprising that a myriad of companies aren't trying to capitalize on this problem like they have with anti-spyware, anti-virus, and anti-intrusion detection. A significant roadblock in the process appears to be that there isn't enough data available to experiment on. Datasets that are available tend to be synthetically-generated and do not offer the variety of user actions that a simulated data set might provide. A true dataset would be ideal for research and analysis, but something like that could only be obtained from a company that monitors its users. Companies are very reluctant to give out data they have collected about their users because they could face legal repercussions for doing so, not to mention bad publicity if word gets out that there is abuse within the company. |